Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : CONDIT -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: 249443 who wrote (497)	7/16/2001 7:40:24 PM
From: Carolyn	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1669

True, but you cannot deny that Condit brought it all on himself by his self-serving behavior in the face of this girl's (an acknowledged friend) disappearance. Maybe that is why people are so angry at Condit and want to find him guilty - his terrible, dishonorable behavior.

To: 249443 who wrote (497)	7/16/2001 8:17:40 PM
From: keefecat	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1669

Hummmmm and no evidence of right-doing. His reluctance to be forthright with police in the beginning and not to have responded to her parents until after they went public is not the actions of an innocent honest man. 1) Her family leaked infidelity 2) Police chief said Condit refused to take a police supervised polygraph. 3) This is true 4) One of the other 2 murdered women was oriental so can not see how she would look similar to ChRANDA 5) SEE #3 6) But his lawyer kept police from taking pair of pants with a questionable stain on them. He is a public servant who failed to cooperate with the police for over 2 mos. As far as I am concerned he is the only suspect at this time.

To: 249443 who wrote (497)	7/16/2001 8:44:10 PM
From: GROUND ZERO™	Respond to of 1669

>>Is infidelity a crime?<< I most definitely believe it is, here's why..... Message 16075207 GZ

To: 249443 who wrote (497)	7/16/2001 8:45:58 PM
From: MulhollandDrive	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1669

"Private" Right of the DNC talking points there, mrfcjmoney? Condit is a public figure, he feeds at the public trough. His constituency have every right in the world to know whether he impeded an investigation or worse. People like Condit want all the perks of the position, but none of the accountability. And people like you assume a willful blindness for partisan reasons. Disgusting.