Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Bill Wexler's Dog Pound -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: N. Dixon who wrote (8116)	7/17/2001 3:14:59 PM
From: Kevin Podsiadlik	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 10293

Nick/Nora: All of Aman's argument is based on a clerical error in the filings that he did apparently did not bother to verify. First of all, that was not all of Asensio's argument, it was all of Thermoview's argument that Asensio's research was flawed. Second, so what you're saying is that Asensio should take the word of a tiny company (with, if he's right, a very checkered history), that is already at odds with him over his prior reports on REFR, over the official records of the Securities and Exchange Commission? And even if the SEC records are wrong and Thermoview is right, doesn't THV bear any responsibility at all for failing to detect this error and have it corrected sometime in the past three-plus years? Trading in ThermoView common stock commenced on April 16, 1998. Prior to April 15, 1998, ThermoView was a development stage corporation, and had no business operations since its incorporation. I have no idea why you boldfaced this statement as it is completely irrelevant. It is the shell company ThermoView merged with that is in question here. Jackal INC (now THV) came into being Dec 1, 1987 (7 months AFTER Jackal INDUSTRIES) and then became, in May of 1994, Oak Hill, and finally, on Feb 24, 1998, became Thermoview--which it was for almost 14 months BEFORE Jackal INDUSTRIES became First Capital. THV had not been known as Jackal for FOUR YEARS at that point. Then riddle me this, Batman. If there's no relationship between these two companies, then why does a "company name" search for "Thermoview" on FreeEdgar turn up the symbol FCRS, that of First Capital Resources? Another clerical error? Curiouser and curiouser... First Capital seems to be propagating that "clerical error" even to this day. From First Capital's most recent 10-Q, dated 5/15/01: COMPANY DATA: CONFORMED NAME: FIRST CAPITAL RESOURCES COM INC CIK: 0000894538 ASSIGNED SIC: 9995 IRS NUMBER: 870438641 STATE OF INCORPORATION: NV FISCAL YEAR END: 1231 FILING VALUES: FORM TYPE: 10QSB ACT: 34 FILE NUMBER: 033-55254-28 FILM NUMBER: 1636229 BUSINESS ADDRESS: STREET1: 4500 140TH AVENUE NORTH STREET2: SUITE 220 CITY: CLEARWATER STATE: FL ZIP: 33762 PHONE: 7275365966 MAIL ADDRESS: STREET1: 1400 EAST OAKLAND PARK BLVD STREET2: SUITE 100 CITY: FORT LAUDERDALE STATE: FL ZIP: 33342 FORMER COMPANY: FORMER CONFORMED NAME: JACKAL INDUSTRIES INC /NV/ DATE CHANGED: 19980622 FORMER COMPANY: FORMER CONFORMED NAME: JACKAL INDUSTRIES INC DATE CHANGED: 19940706 FORMER COMPANY: FORMER CONFORMED NAME: JACKAL INC DATE CHANGED: 19940420 Again, if this is wrong, whose fault is that??