SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Ali Chen who wrote (48145)7/17/2001 8:18:11 PM
From: survivinRespond to of 275872
 
I have a theory...

Ali,

Towards the end of the CC an analyst asked where the subsidies for Rambus memory were tabulated. The answer was from "revenues". About as vague and ambiguous an answer possible.

Are these costs considered part of IAG? Also, do the costs for the intel inside program, other brand marketing, system rebates, etc. get added to IAG only or do they spread these over all divisions?

If they're spending billions to market the intel name, couldn't they spread the total costs over all segments justifying them as an advertising expense which benefits all products?

survivin



To: Ali Chen who wrote (48145)7/17/2001 8:29:57 PM
From: Road WalkerRead Replies (2) | Respond to of 275872
 
Ali,

re: I have a theory which I communicated to you last
quarter. The theory is that Intel writes off some expenses
of microprocessor operations into other, less popular
businesses, to make Intel investors like yourself
to continue to think that the "core" business is
still healthy.


I doubt that that's the case. Intel is judged on it's final bottom line numbers. From the perspective of the average investor, or average analyst for that matter, it doesn't seem to matter which bucket the profits or revenue come from. I don't see the motivation.

From this investors standpoint, it's disgusting the money they are throwing away on the other businesses.

John