Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : The Sauna -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lane3 who wrote (1011)	7/18/2001 11:51:20 AM
From: Tom Clarke	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1857

some particle of tangible evidence of guilt Setting aside speculation, we already know that he suborned perjury, tampered with a witness, and impeded a police investigation. If that was you or me, we'd get arrested.

To: Lane3 who wrote (1011)	7/18/2001 12:04:11 PM
From: J. C. Dithers	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1857

Hi Karen- To me, there is more than enough on the record now for Condit to be ousted from office for "conduct unbecoming." And to me, given what we know, it does make a difference when some women actually go out of their way to speak out on his behalf. We can agree to disagree on this, and get back to our celebration of Goldens and cats. :-) JC

To: Lane3 who wrote (1011)	7/18/2001 3:53:35 PM
From: The Philosopher	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1857

What does gender have to do with the quality or flavor of one's judgment. It shouldn't. But it does. Because the reality is that women react differently than men to to the same situation. And when feminists have in the past so strongly condemned conservative men on no more evidence than there is against Condit, for them now to defend Condit is hypicritical. Since their earlier comments were made as feminists, it is fair to judge their current comments on the basis of their gender. In a perfect world, gender wouldn't matter. So far, I haven't noticed that we've achieved a perfect world yet.