Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : CONDIT -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Augustus Gloop who wrote (881)	7/21/2001 6:08:56 PM
From: CVJ	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1669

You really should repeat the reading comprehension class that you apparently failed or skipped altogether. When you learn to read the meaning of the words as written instead of imparting to them your juvenile desire to see what you want to see, then come back and make untwisted observations and comments. Just to repair one of your many misconceptions, brother Darrell was arrested on a long outstanding warrant for parole violation. He also is wanted, as a normal police procedure, for questioning in case he may possibly be able to shed even a tiny glimmer of light on this baffling case. His status as a brother of Gary Condit makes him a potential source of information, as would be expected in any thorough police investigation. His long rap sheet does in no way drive me to leap to a conclusion about any possible complicity on the part of Gary Condit in the disappearance of Chandra Levy.

To: Augustus Gloop who wrote (881)	7/21/2001 8:15:10 PM
From: AJL	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1669

"Only a redneck or a person who would like to see condit go down based only on political affiliation would agree with the witch hunt we have going now. Innocent until proven guilty is the law of the land for all people. Not just republicans. " I disagree--I consider myself neither a redneck nor a republican--and i find condit's general behavior concerning these matters to be questionable at best. A man who has little or nothing to hide does not need a slimeball legal mouthpiece to speak for him (even though we are living in the Age of Litigation and Lawyering). Step up to the plate and swing for yourself, I say. Furthermore, whenever i see footage of the man on TV, he gives me the creeps--his smile is as phoney as a 3 dollar bill. My gut tells me he's got something to hide, and my instincts are generally quite good. Granted, you can't condemn a man based on instinct and hypothesis, and certainly he's innocent til proven guilty. I just have a feeling. Frankly, I think you are displaying more partisan behavior than some others here in your paranoia re. political affiliation (granted I imagine there are some who want to take him down purely on a dem. vs. repub. agenda, but those people are clueless reactionaries anyway.) A scumbag in a donkey suit is still a scumbag. Personally, I would have the same reaction to the man if he were a republican, perhaps even a little stronger since i feel that many repubs. display a smug, holier-than-thou attitude, espec. the hard-line right.