Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neocon who wrote (20152)	8/1/2001 11:46:26 AM
From: one_less	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

leaky bucket.

To: Neocon who wrote (20152)	8/1/2001 12:55:17 PM
From: The Philosopher	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 82486

The complete exclusion of extra- marital sex depends upon religious premises that are not likely to be normative for a lot of people. Not entirely. Also on basic contract law. Marriage is a contract. If our contract says that neither of us will have extramarital sex, as many marriage vows do, then doing so is a breach of contract. Basic dishonesty. Of course, we can agree to have an open marriage. But extramarital sex without the prior agreement of the other person that it's okay to do so is dishonest, fraudulent, and a breach of contract, which in my book are pretty good definitions of illicit.