Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Stock Attack II - A Complete Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Trading Machine who wrote (13413)	8/1/2001 12:16:01 PM
From: donald sew	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 52237

Trading Machine, >>>> all is well! AJC just said "the worst is over" on CNBC!!! ggg <<<< I also heard it. My point isnt whether she or other analysts are right or wrong, my point is how these analysts manipulate the market. Dont anyone tell me that GOLDMAN SACHs doesnt have a strong technical analysis department. And dont tell me that their TA department is strongly bullish - believe me they know their TA and they know well that they cant support Abbey's bullish comment with legitimate technical analysis, and Im not talking about the junk that Ralph Makethempooer does. Im talking about statistically viable technical analysis. Im not saying crash, Im just saying that Goldman Sach's TA department cannot support ABBEYS bullish comment with good TA. So lets go on the premise that I am right, that the SACH's TA department cannot support ABBEYs bullishness - then the question is why is she so firm about her position and not even extend the possiblity that she could be wrong.???? Could it be that ugly "M" word, MANIPULATION? I didnt hear the whole thing, but normally she is firm with her position and not hesitant.