SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Road Walker who wrote (140758)8/3/2001 12:42:00 AM
From: Jim McMannis  Respond to of 186894
 
I know John. I can't say I'd do it differently if I was Intel. At least Intel doesn't seem to be losing too much more share and they make up some the ASPs on the little guys.
Looking more and more like they will get to Northwood before AMD gets to 30% market share.



To: Road Walker who wrote (140758)8/7/2001 5:20:32 AM
From: Amy J  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Hi John, charging 100% more is actually hugely significant.

That strategy would leave enough crumbs (i.e. business to Intel's competitors) to keep Intel's competitors alive.

Sounds like Intel's not interested in the crumbs. Different strategy than Microsoft. Microsoft always goes for the kill, each and every crumb, Intel seems to leave just enough on the table for some competitors to keep alive. But maybe that keeps the FTC away.

Regards,
Amy J


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News