Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (138533)	8/3/2001 1:54:25 PM
From: i-node	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1571200

what harm it will do, you wouldn't understand Come on, can't you make a little better argument than THAT?

To: tejek who wrote (138533)	8/3/2001 5:07:28 PM
From: Jim McMannis	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1571200

RE:"Re. what harm it will do, you wouldn't understand but just for the record, the Alaskans are divided over the issue. However, the Dem. governor is for it" What's the choice? Continue to cow down to OPEC and ask everyone to cut back on consumption? Maybe some pie in the sky alternative energy source? Sad to say but it's looks lke the choice is clear. Or would you rather see more drilling in the Gulf of Mexico or off California? Jim

To: tejek who wrote (138533)	8/3/2001 9:29:02 PM
From: Yousef	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1571200

TheJerk, Re: " ... you wouldn't understand but just for the record, the Alaskans are divided over the issue." Technically you are correct ... One dissenting Alaskan makes this a divided issue. However, do you think this is 50/50 divided. I think a "vote" by Alaskans on this could solve this problem. I bet you wouldn't support that ... would you, TheJerk ? Something about imposing the Federal governments will on Alaska appeals to you, right ? I mean, this 2000 acres is just so "pristine" and important to the future of the US, right ?? Make It So, Yousef