SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Steve's Channelling Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Dale Baker who wrote (22899)8/4/2001 9:01:13 AM
From: Rich1  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 30051
 
Thats not even close...he had a support band at 1209/1210 and it bounced from there so we still had a higher low..Thats the facts.He had the high Friday.Monday a month ago and moved it up one day..BTW there is nothing that says it has to be a higher high...
Its difficult for you to understand without all the facts as I am only dribbling a little of the info..
Check his past record if you like...
stocktimefactor.com
There is a free section under archives..



To: Dale Baker who wrote (22899)8/4/2001 10:49:04 AM
From: Mark Johnson  Respond to of 30051
 
<<Those trying to use objective models just get whipsawed over and over. That's a more or less "objective" conclusion drawn from the last few thousand messages here>>

First post I've seen here with objective thought in a long time......Yet the lapdogs still appeal to Zeev...with no results....LOL....



To: Dale Baker who wrote (22899)8/4/2001 11:27:08 AM
From: bobby beara  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 30051
 
hey stuart, most people here are trading the range,

>>>>Most SI commentators have decided where they think the markets SHOULD go and they arrange their "evidence" accordingly. It's useless as a scientific method.>>>>

you mean like this guy -g-

Message 15333732

quote.yahoo.com