Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Steve's Channelling Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Zeev Hed who wrote (22928)	8/4/2001 6:21:44 PM
From: orkrious	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 30051

Apart of that, these are so "boring", you are better off buying F o GM if you want a cyclical play. Actually, what I am always on the lookout for is something that will perform well (maybe 10%) over the next several years without a lot of risk (doesn't everyone). Like many people, I have a lot of cash that I want to put to work and it is tough sitting on my hands. I have no interest in buying a true cyclical like F or GM. Although GM hiring Bob Lutz was a great move, I have a hard time seeing value in an American auto company. What are your thoughts on the author's idea of some international funds? I agree with his premise of the kicker from a declining dollar. The problem is what part of the world (or even what companies) is going to be relatively immune from a global slowdown?