To: Rarebird who wrote (74515 ) 8/5/2001 9:26:24 PM From: IngotWeTrust Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 116752 >>without invoking your [GPM] superficial and plastic seniority rights.<< Gawd, Birdhead, you're so full of it. Acc'd to your public post a couple days back, YOU STATED YOU were "uncomfortable" with me responding to some newbie GPM pipsqueek who thought you had no right to call yourself creative and visionary, but should let others venerate you instead. I posted 2 points to thread pipsqueek: One, I stated you or any one of us for that matter had the inalienable right to call our selfhood anything [in this case "complimentary"] you/me/another wanted to label your self-ness/ our self-ness, and TWO, reminded the newbie pipsqueek climbing your birdbeak that you'd been around a long time here and elsewhere and had earned your GPM stripes, albeit checkered and arrogant, condescending, and somewhat splayed and frayed, thereby little use for flying at the head of either the long or short "migrating bird 'V' formation" lately. For this two point reply: I get vitriol and public belittling comments about my body size [of which you know nothing] and urinal whanger thumpin' demonstrations to show the play ground boys (and Hutch, of course) how tough you are because an Oregon girl claims the human right to self-describe/self-label belongs to the individual? Then you decide to parade yourself as the humanist's answer to the Godhead, the trader's answer to contrarian thinking, and the thread's newest Hutch clone?? Now, in one last desparate move you decide to whip out the old male standby--- You trumpet the Male/Dr Phil/Men are from Mars party pap, "accusing me [female] of never having been "logical" here or elsewhere. I mean, let's get real, Bird, EVVVVVVVVeryone knows and venerates the tenet that logic is a "god given, inalienable male quality."Pardon me, threaders, while I puke. <-----FWIW was a physiologic response, not an emotional fit<grin> Therefore, by virtue of my plumbing's internal placement, I am automatically, hormonally, enviromentally, socio-economically and automatically rendered illogical & while your plumbing placement is [logically??] externally located "out there" for all males [and females] to observe and comment, crave, idolize? I've always challenged YOU logically and methodically on gold-centric topics. I will continue to do so as suits me. I have admirably stood up to you by my own standards. Others have concurred. Others have demurred, Others have disagreed. So be it. I've still require your public apology for your publically insulting behavior toward me. I know it is not coming. It doesn't change the requirement. So you now claim you want to discuss ideas, presumably about gold since this is the thread topic? Let's all standby and see if you can come up with an original one? So far, all the thread has heard from you are 1) the glories of shorting gold equities...now THEIR'S a new idea 2) your musings regarding the relationship between housing stats and gold...(--man, that one is so hoary it has certifiably harvestable quantites of pond scum on it) 3) central bank hoard musings...WOW, another new idea --and little else recently except how uncomfortable you are with God <---originator of all "original thought, and now, according to you, originator of "original sin"...and how uncomfortable you are with me. So, I have an "idea"... how about you coming up with a NEW IDEA on how to make money with gold and share that with this thread? Or how about a new idea about how to create a new "god" or where to find, identify and follow one should one require a more modern god vision/version? This could get interesting... especially if you truly are creative and visionary about gold that is... Double bird dare ya. gold_tutor