SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: thames_sider who wrote (20677)8/6/2001 8:50:28 AM
From: Neocon  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
On the first point, I do not know precisely how to alter security arrangements, but then, such an alteration was unnecessary in considering task assignments. On the second, I am not sure it was a matter of politeness, rather than holding firm, which is more consequential.....On Poland, you may be right, although the major population loss was from Jewish areas not highly integrated into the nation, and therefore better counted as a loss to world Jewry. Still, Poland suffered quite a bit. On the other hand, it was not a choice.......



To: thames_sider who wrote (20677)8/6/2001 2:10:25 PM
From: TimF  Respond to of 82486
 
BTW, I'd say Poland bore rather more of the brunt of WWII than the US or any other country... during and afterwards...)

They where high on the list of those who felt the most suffering from WWII. The US and the USSR shouldered the brunt of the burden for defeating the Axis (but then they had broader shoulders then the other countries).

Tim


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News