SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: The Philosopher who wrote (20734)8/6/2001 2:46:46 PM
From: one_less  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 82486
 
"Maybe because it's not a porno magazine?"

Oh good...Playboy does not seek profit from the use of
pictures, writing, or other material that is sexually explicit and intended for use by persons seeking sexual stimulation outside of that offered by a marriage partner (or the person neocon's son is going steady with)? It does not employ women for use in graphic portrayal of their sexuality for this purpose? Just some good articles and ...uh...a little art work, right?



To: The Philosopher who wrote (20734)8/6/2001 3:04:57 PM
From: Tom Clarke  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
Some of the photo shoots are artistic, but the faux lesbian spreads have to qualify as soft porn...