SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Alighieri who wrote (138644)8/7/2001 8:58:19 AM
From: i-node  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1571455
 
Because there are very few places on Earth relatively free of encroachment and this place was set aside to be one. The oil is not worth violating that principle nor risking upsetting the balance that exists there.

Ok, I'll agree, arguendo, that there are very few places, etc. And I'll agree that, IN YOUR VIEW, the oil isn't worth it.

Would the oil be worth it if we suddenly lost a major foreign supplier, and crude prices jumped to, say, $48? $68? Would the oil be worth it if we were engaged in a war and a lack of crude was impeding our ability to maintain our economy? What about if it were impeding our ability to fight and win the war?

My point is, what is your price? At what point do you say, to hell with the wildlife, we need the oil? Caution -- your answer here will determine whether you're a reasonable person or an Environmentalist Wacko.

Or, are there simply no circumstances under which you'd be willing to agree to drilling in ANWR?



To: Alighieri who wrote (138644)8/7/2001 9:08:11 AM
From: Yousef  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1571455
 
Al,

Re: "The cattle and corn are intended for harvest and are not a
delicate ecosystem that has taken millions of years to evolve."

I believe that both corn and cattle have taken well over a million years
to evolve ... We really are dealing with a "genius" here. <ggg>

Make It So,
Yousef