Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: wanna_bmw who wrote (141650)	8/16/2001 2:13:08 AM
From: Mani1	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Re <<Glad you can admit that you were bashing >> I was just using Elmer's words, if you did not notice I put 'bashing' in quotation. Re <<Of course, anyone pointing out your technical mistakes deserves to be bashed, isn't that right? >> None sense. You show up in SI, make comments that are incorrect and don't expect to be challenged. Re <<after several people told you otherwise, and the specs were staring you right in the face, that you were still too proud to admit you were wrong>> Nope. Those people were just taking an opportunity to take a shot at me and they did. I expect the same here again, which will not bother me. If you followed the posting it became clear from the subsequent posts that you were wrong. Re <<BTW, I still have those specs handy if you want to press the issue.>> Go ahead, knock yourself out. You have been misinterpreting those thermal specs. You can keep saying what you have been saying, I can respond with what I have been saying, I don't think anything will be resolved. As our discussion in PM, I thought we were going to drop this one, but apparently you changed your mind and started again by responding to my post to Elmer, which I was defending myself. Too bad I took you off Ignore. You can go ahead and have the last word, and lets call it done. Mani