Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: daryll40 who wrote (50650)	8/16/2001 10:36:53 AM
From: Pink Minion	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 70976

But the actual "ACT" that started this Naz slide was the Clinton Justice Dept action Puleaze explain this logic. Number one the suit was started in 1997 not April of 2000. If you are talking about the break-up ruling, then how did this affect consumers from buying more PC's? Could it possibly be that they already had four PC's? How did this affect companies from buying more routers and servers? Could it possibly be that they were already on the internet? How did this affect companies lighting up more fiber? Could it possibly be that bandwidth cost were decreasing and it didn't quite make sense to lose more money by adding bandwidth? Just because the timing coincided doesn't mean didly. I started drinking milk in April 2000, did that cause the slide?

To: daryll40 who wrote (50650)	8/16/2001 10:59:41 AM
From: JakeStraw	Respond to of 70976

>>But the actual "ACT" that started this Naz slide was the Clinton Justice Dept action Yeah you keep trying to convince yourself that that is actually true...C'mon don't be so naive!!