Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: E who wrote (22439)	8/16/2001 4:46:45 PM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

I didn't imply anything. I stated it quite directly. Indirectness is not my style. Neither does my repetoire include an excess of tact. I call'em as I sees'em. I think that XXX's posts could quite reasonably lead to the conclusion that brees has stated. Could brees' statement have been better expressed? Probably. So could many of my own posts and I write daily as part of my making my living. I stated quite directly that I doubted XXX had used the exact words brees used. Perhaps it was because I have conversed frequently with brees on a wide variety of subjects both publicly and via PM that I believe that I understood what he was driving at. So I don't see the "lie" or the "dishonesty" and I don't see the problem. I understood quite clearly what he was saying which was expressed in way which was perhaps more direct than you might feel appropriate. JLA