SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : All About Sun Microsystems -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Charles Tutt who wrote (44486)8/17/2001 5:31:42 PM
From: Robert  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 64865
 
Opps, Itanium runs like a snail on legacy x86 code.....

(from aceshardware.com

x86 hardware?

As far as we know, the Itanium is supposed to have special hardware to translate x86 code on the fly, but it seems that
translating x86 to decent "EPIC code" is almost impossible.

x86 integer code runs six times slower than native code, while x87 floating-point code runs up to 15 times slower! The
hardware translator can not rearrange instructions and optimize code like the compiler can, and this results in a massive
performance decrease.

Floating-point code runs even slower because the main advantages of the Itanium, FP instructions with three
addresses and 128 entry registry file are not available in x87 code.



To: Charles Tutt who wrote (44486)8/18/2001 11:55:04 AM
From: Joseph Pareti  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 64865
 
>Itanium just might suck at running "legacy" software

while Ultra Sucker (TM) sucks at running everything across the board.

>There might be a big surge in Xeon and AMD sales,

The big surge in AMD camp I am aware of is their LOSSES