Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Steve's Channelling Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bilow who wrote (24644)	8/18/2001 9:42:40 PM
From: stockmarket14	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 30051

Bilow: RMBS lost its battle on SDRAM to IFX ONLY (NOT THEY as you stated), not DDR either. Only IFX, Micron and Hudiax refuse to pay royalties on SDRAM. You should also know that Judge Payne dismissed IFX claim of RMBS freuld in DDR last week. In addition, the IFX issue is currently in appeal court. More than 50% of the Markman's ruling is overturned in the appeal court. Don't you know that the 2 experts appointed by an Italian court oncluded, after 5 month length investigation, that Micron also infringed on RMBS patents on SDRAM, but the judge refused to place injunction on Micron for economic reason, lay off Italian works by closing down factory. Although the name of the Samsung's payment is changed, Samsung is still paying to RMBS for its SDRAM production. SDRAM is an out of date technology and will be replaced by both RDRAM and DDR within 1-2 yrs.