Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Stock Attack II - A Complete Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TechTrader42 who wrote (16071)	8/21/2001 9:34:57 AM
From: Chris	Respond to of 52237

09:07 ET Semi Equip Book/Bill : The semiconductor equipment book/bill ratio will be released after the close today; Briefing.com has gathered estimates from six brokerage firms and has calculated a mean estimate of 0.60 for July from 0.54 in June. Note, however, that most firms see orders continuing to fall, but see shipments falling faster. Only Cowen, with its high forecast of 0.70, sees orders "stabilizing."

To: TechTrader42 who wrote (16071)	8/21/2001 10:10:47 AM
From: bob wallace	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 52237

Brooke I am still trying to figure out why you like the SPX better than the NDX - both seem to me to be in about the same boat chart patternwise and oscillator wise and BBwise. in fact I see a nice rounded bottom forming on the 15, 30, and 60 minute charts for the NDX, which should be a strong pattern assuming we survive G and his merry band. what are the subtle (or perhaps glaring) differenecs you see in the NDX. Thanks Bob

To: TechTrader42 who wrote (16071)	8/21/2001 11:11:07 AM
From: donald sew	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 52237

Brook, >>>> Cramer, the voice of reason. Case of the pot calling the kettle black? <<<< Im have no great respect for Cramer's calls and I dont follow him thoroughly. Lets not confuse an analyst who has been wrong often, with one that manipulates. I am aware of CRAMER's obnoxious big mouth and many wrong calls, but from the interviews I have seen I do not get the impression that he belongs in the same category as those of the MAJOR MANIPULATORs. My target is toward the MANIPULATORs, not ANALYSTS who are just wrong, although its obvious there is an overlap. If CRAMER does belong in the MANIPULATING GROUP, I havent seen it, but then again I dont read his every word. If others feel he should be in the MANIPULATING GROUP, and have valid support for that, then so be it and put the bugger into that group. Here's where I make the distintion - ANALYSTS who are consistently wrong should not be followed and eventually lose their jobs/demoted/etc. ANALYSTS who MANIPULATE should be thrown in JAIL.