Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : The California Energy Crisis - Information & Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Raymond Duray who wrote (926)	8/23/2001 2:26:45 AM
From: Rick McDougall	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1715

No specific info but maybe you can scare up something interesting/meaningful at this site. energy.ca.gov

To: Raymond Duray who wrote (926)	8/23/2001 3:13:54 PM
From: DavesM	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1715

Raymond, I owe you and the rest of the thread an apology. My statement that load was 10,000MW lower than last year is in error. This mistake was made because: 1. I remembered that in early May of 2000, the CAISO had a press release (recently obtained from their web site) that stated that they expected demand during a normal summer day to be ~45,000MW going as high as 48,000 MW during a hot day. 2. Lately, I saw that peak consumption was running ~32,000MW (also according to the ISO site). From what I can find now. Peak loads last August never reached 45K MW maybe not even 44K. Due to ordered conservation efforts mandated by the Governor, and power shedding by large consumers by order of the ISO? I see now that the proper way loads are being compared, is to look at days with similar temperatures, then looking at loads this year vs. last. This difference seems to be running around 4,000MW.