SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Neocon who wrote (24237)8/23/2001 9:32:50 AM
From: Neocon  Respond to of 82486
 
Missed the window, meant "latter".....



To: Neocon who wrote (24237)8/23/2001 9:39:58 AM
From: Dayuhan  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 82486
 
do we take values as purely personal and arbitrary, or do we think there is a standard by which personal values can be judged and discussed, amended and improved?

Another question, very relevant: if we accept that a standard exists, do we assume that the standard in question is absolute, or do we believe that the standard is also amenable to judgement, discussion, amendment, and improvement? This to me is a much more significant question, since I have yet to hear anyone argue that values are purely personal and arbitrary. The debate that I have seen most frequently here is between those who believe that values are created by humans out of human experience, and that they develop and change as societies develop and change, and those who believe that values are determined by some hypothetical outside factor. I haven't seen the notion the notion that values are or should be purely personal and arbitrary enter the picture.

The notion that values must be either absolute and externally referenced or completely personal and arbitrary is not supportable; there is a world of space between those extremes.



To: Neocon who wrote (24237)8/23/2001 9:45:45 AM
From: Lane3  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 82486
 
or do we think there is a standard by which personal values can be judged and discussed, amended and improved?

I wonder, then, why we are not discussing this more...

Karen



To: Neocon who wrote (24237)8/23/2001 10:05:12 AM
From: Lane3  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
I don't see any case being made from recent thread behavior, frankly.

The utility of the thread case study, IMO, is to illustrate that, no matter what standard of values there may be, absolute or otherwise, or whether one's personal values conform to the standard or not, one requires the character to act according to those values. Being part of the club with the approved set of values is worth nothing but a license to wave the values flag.

Karen