Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mr. Whist who wrote (174357)	8/26/2001 12:40:16 PM
From: CYBERKEN	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

<<Yes or no?>> The answer, very obviously, is no. The Democratic House created deficits in the '80's, and were saved by the early years of the Reagan boom, that was generated by the last significant tax reform. The public grew complacent, and let themselves be sold the Clinton used car in '92 and '96, but never gave him a majority. Instead they gave the House back to the Republicans, who stopped the Clinton socialist movement enough to allow the country to realize the rest of the Reagan boom. Clinton personally took credit for Reagan's work by doing the only thing he has ever shown any ability to do: lying. But it didn't help in 2000, where the economy and a massive manufacturing of votes were supposed to give Gore an easy walk-in to the White House. Now the Democrats are out of candidates, out of Reagan momentum, and finding their legacy to be a severe economic slowdown caused by their over-taxation of the productive sector for almost a decade. And they continue to fight for the deflation that they have mistakenly created. Not because they think it's good policy, but because they HAVE no policy other then scaring the aged, swindling the blacks, and leading the feminists around by the nose. A team of Republicans with a some spine (as opposed to Trent Lott), some principle (as opposed to Pete Dominici) and some brains (as opposed to John McCain) is now in charge, and ready to spotlight the corruption and intellectual bankruptcy of the modern Democratic party and it's lapdog media to what will be an attentive public in 2002 and 2004. Against this, the Democrats can throw up Gary Condit, and a recent history that is even more corrupt than that benighted congressman...