Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Strictly: Drilling II -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Victor Lazlo who wrote (621)	8/26/2001 12:23:35 AM
From: isopatch	Respond to of 36161

OT/Vic Read my last post to Frank. Then please calm down.<g> You're the one sounding hysterical, not Frank. If you can't express meaningful on topic opinions without all this name calling, I'm going to put you on ignore. Isopatch

To: Victor Lazlo who wrote (621)	8/26/2001 3:05:04 AM
From: c.hinton	Respond to of 36161

One more thing to be paranoid about news.bbc.co.uk

To: Victor Lazlo who wrote (621)	8/26/2001 7:44:01 AM
From: Frank Pembleton	Respond to of 36161

hysterical and relentless fear-mongering is unhealthy Dear Victor I'm interested in your analysis, but it is incomplete. Could you please post charts, news articles and statistics? Use hotlinks, or urls, where possible in order to facilitate due diligence. I have, haven't I? Message 16243040 That's a proper example of a civil exchange! Regards Frank P.

To: Victor Lazlo who wrote (621)	8/26/2001 9:03:02 AM
From: Roebear	Respond to of 36161

Victor, Is this you?: "Victor Charles Lazlo, professor of parapsychology; he is also a latent psychic and .... is a hunted criminal wanted by the NGR." palladiumbooks.com LOL Roebear

To: Victor Lazlo who wrote (621)	8/27/2001 1:13:54 AM
From: rails99	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 36161

Hi Victor: Welcome to the thread. It is my belief that you may have been mislead by your own interpretation of the long-ago(not here identified) post, as provided by Frank. Believe you have made a mistake. When a person floats a URL it does not mean the poster believed each word in the storyline and demands that you also believe in the content. Can you possibly review the information: As to whether the post was intended as market fact for the thread to believe without doubt; or if the post was presented as a URL for the thread to see and upon review agree; that the data was not intended for an unknowing investor( or perhaps speculator); and was possibly provided to the thread, only as an example of talking-head hucksterism. Does this make sense to you? I have read most all of Frank's post contributions to this thread (and Ugh!, only once in a while, I may regret same) and that I believe Frank to be a sincere threadster, who would like to provide many worthwhile and productive contributions to you and the thread. You should realize that the intent of the majority of the threadsters is to actively discuss the possibilities of holding lucrative stock/option holdings and invest(or liquidate) in the manner of the contrarian investor. Many of the successful members of the thread are consistently ahead of the majority in identifying a sector of the market to be watched and perhaps choosing ...., etc. Please know: That I am the one who should be viewed as suspect; as I am notorious for lousy, misleading posts to the thread. Thanks in advance for your consideration. Rails