SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: IngotWeTrust who wrote (75751)9/1/2001 11:27:37 AM
From: Square_Dealings  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 116753
 
You seem to be quite emotional about GATA for some personal reasons which are not clear.

The only surprise with GATA could be that the case will actually go to discovery, and you know how one thing leads to another....

The financial system is closed to the public that funds it. Just like the media is a closed network of good ole boys.

Maybe for some of us a win for GATA would be just to expose the TRUTH and let the public take it from there.

M.



To: IngotWeTrust who wrote (75751)9/2/2001 12:12:42 PM
From: long-gone  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 116753
 
along those lines:
A Watershed in
Central Banks' Role
in the Gold Market?

by Timothy Green

As the curtain is set to rise on the euro, the new European common currency due on January 1, 1999, a clearer picture of the role that gold will play in the reserves backing it is emerging. The new European Central Bank (ECB) will hold 15 percent of its reserves in gold, according to Wim Duisenberg, its first president. That will comprise about 29 million ounces of gold contributed by the central banks of the eleven founding members of the euro club. While this proportion is less than gold miners had hoped for, it appears to be a reasonable compromise, given that some rumors had suggested under 10 percent or even no gold in the reserve basket. The crucial fact that gold is included is confirmation of gold's special role in the public's perception.
As Rudolf Trink, Head of Treasury at the Strategy Division of the Austrian Central Bank (one of euro's founding members) told the Financial Times World Gold Conference in Barcelona at the end of June: "Public confidence in central banks is largely based on the idea that they are not primarily income-driven institutions, but are responsible for maintaining confidence and trust in the currency. Therefore psychology is, and should be, an important factor factor the holding of gold by central banks.
What is not resolved, of course, is what happens to the 386 million ounces that will remain with the national central banks in Europe. Some of them, notably Belgium and the Netherlands, have been significant sellers during the 1990s, in part to help them meet the various criteria for joining the euro. That incentive is now over (or it is too late). In the future, national central banks will almost certainly need approval of the ECB itself to indulge in outright sales. But that is not to stop them lending gold to the market (as many do already) or entering into swaps. Indeed, the European Central Bank itself may well enter the market. Luis Linde, Director General of the Bank of Spain's foreign department, told the FT's Barcelona conference that the ECB will become a new participant in the gold financial market, because there is little incentive for a central bank to hold gold as a non-revenue producing asset. He added that "more active gold management is obviously a compromise between not holding gold and holding unproductive gold." That trend, however, could bring back more stability and confidence to the gold market. Active management is quite distinct from the secret sales that have plagued the market in recent years. As Brad Klein of the AIG Trading Group pointed out at the FT Conference, central banks will probably change their approach to gold, becoming stabilizing forces rather than "going on the rampage" with uncoordinated sales.
Although the recent announcement that the Swiss government is proposing a referendum and legislation during the next year or two to sever the official link between gold and note issue (which must be 40 percent gold backed) might seem counter to this new vogue, we must realize that the proposal may not win approval of Swiss voters, and that subsequent gold salesperhaps half the Swiss reserveswould be carefully managed and spaced over a decade. Moreover, the market would know what was happening.
Thus, the gold market may be approaching a watershed on the controversial matter of central bank participation. We have been through nearly a decade of unheralded gold sales by central banks addressing their own national agenda (quite apart from supplying the market with liquidity by lending at low rates), but most are now moving to positive management of gold. That does not mean an end to lending. As Brett Kebble of JCI Gold argued at the FT Conference, they might start holding out for higher interest rates of 5 to 6 percent instead of the current 1 to 1.5 percent. But in Europe, at least, they may present a more coordinated, transparent approach.
That, in itself, could help the market. The problem of the last year, as AIG's Brad Klein told the FT Conference, has been that the U.S. hedge funds, fearing European central bank gold sales, sold the metal short, thus dragging the price lower than was justified. The sales were not the problem, it was speculators' fear of unquantified secret sales.
After the FT's Barcelona Conference, I asked Dr. Jessica Cross, Director of Crosswords Research and Consulting, who chaired the second day, if she detected a new, more encouraging mood about central bank participation. "I believe the hump of central bank sales is over," she said. "And if central banks could now move off center stage and operate on the management of their gold more like fund managers, then the hedge managers of the U.S. funds themselves could `read' the market much better. And then, beyond the millennium, a much healthier, more stable gold market will emerge."
Editor's Note: Timothy Green's book The World of Gold and other books in The Gold Collection are available through The Gold Institute, Suite 240, 1112 16th Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20036, telephone: (202) 835-0185. Visit the Web site at www.goldinstitute.com.
thebullandbear.com



To: IngotWeTrust who wrote (75751)9/2/2001 12:30:56 PM
From: long-gone  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 116753
 
Funds take some blame for gold's movements
Everybody who is anybody in the gold industry was at the 21st annual FT World Gold Conference in Barcelona this week. JULIE WALKER reports

JESSICA Cross, a highly respected voice in the global gold market, chaired the last session of the Financial Times 21st World Gold Conference and closed it on a more positive note than was possible a year earlier: she expects another tough 18 months or so but thereafter, she can see prospects for improvement.
A South African, Cross runs her own consultancies, Crosswords Research and Consulting and the Internet-based Virtual Gold commentary and database. She introduced the session with some research on "funds" - oft quoted as responsible for short or medium-term movements in the gold price.

When it comes to explanations of gold events, funds have often replaced the Russians, the Middle Easterners, producer hedging and the official sector as likely culprits.

Cross looked at 1 257 trading entities - 725 hedge funds, 314 commodity trading advisors (CTAs) and 218 funds of funds collectively managing $185-billion and relying on computer-generated trading strategies. She concluded profits in the funds business were just as hard-earned as in any industry - 83% of the money under management made returns of between 10% and 25% a year and only 0.5% doubled.

However, on the weight-of-money and collective activity grounds, the funds have large potential to influence comparatively small markets such as gold.

Greg Newton, president of the publishing group Managed Account Reports Inc, endorsed Cross's last comment, saying perhaps fewer than 10% of hedge funds were in gold.

His view is that whatever the funds buy has to make a big difference, and because there are too many unknowns in the market, funds are unlikely to go for gold at present. Newton says gold's lack of price volatility and supply uncertainties on central-bank holdings count against it (this echoes the sentiments of investment house Goldman Sachs given at a private dinner: gold is an acronym for "guaranteed oversupply, limited dishoarding").

Central banks came under attack from several producers, among them JCI Gold's Brett Kebble and Placer Dome's John Willson.

Kebble questions why central banks perpetuate the gold contango by lending the metal to producers and even backers of projects such as railways at lease rates of 1% to 1.5%.

This gold is sold and the proceeds applied to higher-yielding, interest-earning securities. Such market participants are "eternally grateful to the central banks for their largesse", according to Kebble, who says it is "a strange quirk of commerce . . . shareholders would have a lot to say if a company lent out high-value assets at low interest rates". He knocks the central banks for their shroud of secrecy and lack of transparency: in his view gold could be 15% higher if lease rates of 5% to 6% were applied.

Willson made a similar point: central banks earned perhaps $1-billion from lending gold, but the value of their gold holdings had been lowered by $100-billion as a consequence. "The major factor contributing to the decline of gold's purchasing power has been the mobilisation of western central bank gold reserves through gold lending since the early 1980s."

While conceding net central-bank sales have had a minimal impact on the gold price, "past central-bank gold sales have been disclosed without regard for the impact on market sentiment".

Despite Cross's exhortations, none of the central bankers among the delegates rebutted the accusations.

Central bankers delivered the first two papers of the conference. Luis Linde, director general of the Bank of Spain's foreign department, speaks of more active management of gold by the coming European central bank and the national central banks, "obviously a compromise between not holding gold and holding unproductive gold . . . normalising gold's position in the balance sheet, treating it as just one more risk asset and not as a store of wealth linked to the credibility or prestige of the monetary authority".

Linde notes that great progress has been made on transparency in the past 10 years, such as publishing the interest rate on gold swaps and the lease rate on lending gold, but there is still no public reference to the rates each counterparty is prepared to pay for gold deposits. "It is true that these rates can be calculated from the lease rate, but, perhaps, a direct contribution from operators could make the loan market even more transparent."

Rudolf Trink, head of treasury strategy at the Austrian National Bank, spoke on gold and the Euro (the new European currency), admitting the factors "are not really providing strong arguments for central banks to hold gold. However . . . central banks have the primary objective of ensuring monetary stability.

"In order to succeed, credibility in the public eye is indispensable. There is no doubt a certain portion of gold is adding to this credibility and it is under this aspect I expect central bank gold holdings will play a somewhat different but nevertheless very important role in the new European System of Central Banks environment. After all, history shows currencies came and went but gold always remained."

It would have been interesting to discuss whether gold will be quoted in Euros, and how the value-added tax on gold of the member countries will be dealt with: in some countries tax is zero and in others as much as 17.5%.

Meanwhile, gold producers presented their efforts to reduce the production cost of gold in a section entitled "Mining: Facing up to the price", chaired by Anglogold's Bobby Godsell.

They mostly strived for excellence, supported hedging as a defence mechanism and worked on improvements in productivity.

Godsell attributes Anglogold's reduction in cash costs from $295/oz 15 months ago to $250/oz to enhanced technology, skills development and new job structures.

Emphasis is on growth and entrepreneurial marketing, and top companies "will survive the current low price scenario . . . set fair for the day when the bull market returns, as return it must".

btimes.co.za