SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Books, Movies, Food, Wine, and Whatever -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Lane3 who wrote (1385)9/1/2001 8:56:33 PM
From: cosmicforce  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 51728
 
<When one tolerates differences, one rises above one's distaste. >

That's what I was getting at. It takes a conscious resistance to action or reaction.

As a former regulator, you might get a kick out of knowing that my company has chosen me as a Subject Matter Expert. I get to interact with the FDA, explaining the systems I've put in place to satisfy 21CFR820 compliance. Oh, boy...

It's funny what we end up doing sometimes. This is NOT what I imagined doing for a living. It's not bad, it's just not what I imagined.



To: Lane3 who wrote (1385)9/2/2001 1:08:50 AM
From: Rambi  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 51728
 
I think you're trying to take what I said too far beyond of the area I originally was addressing- which began with a list of the characteristics I value in people, one of which was tolerance. Po and X then said they were unable to tolerate bigots, or people who tried to destroy your ideas. And I said that I thought that would be taking tolerance to an extreme, that when something invaded one's moral "space" (for lack of a better word, I just threw that one out), there was not some sort of tolerance imperative that meant you had to accept anything and everything. I didn't see tolerance as unconditional or all-inclusive.

Then COs said tolerance was a passive process(although in a later post to you he says it implies action or reaction, so maybe I am misunderstanding what he originally said, which wouldn't surprise me at all; I don't know HOW you all keep everything straight doing this) and I said I didn't think it was. That if we just passively tolerate anything, it isn't tolerance any longer-- it has become indifference. ANd by indifference I meant the negative type -apathy, a not caring that someone was destroying ideas, or being a bigot, or whatever else those things were Po and X were saying they couldn't tolerate, not indifference because of not being aware. So I would agree with Cos when he later says that we have to work at tolerance.
And I would agree with what you said about the different forms of indifference, but it wasn't really related to what I had originally been trying to say.
Which was that I value tolerance in people, as I do your in wading through this convoluted post.