Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : High Tolerance Plasticity -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DanWebzster who wrote (7483)	9/6/2001 2:40:12 PM
From: aerosappy	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 23153

Dan -- re: CXIPY. I suspect that dabum will answer your question more fully, but I would be careful shorting an issue with such a low average trading volume.

To: DanWebzster who wrote (7483)	9/6/2001 2:40:46 PM
From: aerosappy	Respond to of 23153

[duplicate]

To: DanWebzster who wrote (7483)	9/6/2001 4:33:40 PM
From: chowder	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 23153

Dan, thanks for the kind words. I appreciate it. I don't know what to tell you about CXIPY. I don't follow them so I don't know anything about the company fundamentals. Since the stock is so lightly traded, I believe knowing those fundamentals are critical. TA by itself, in this instance, should be ignored because the stock can be so easily manipulated. I have shorted KWK, even though it's thinly traded but only because Jim P did such a fine job showing the company fundamentals didn't support the high share price. I'm sorry I couldn't help here, but in the spirit of the fine job Metal Trader has been doing today, I thought I'd pass along an old economy stock that looks to be in the early stages of an uptrending pattern. CAT .... stockcharts.com[h,a]daclyimy[pb20!b10!f][vc60][iut!Ub14!Ua12,26,9!Lh14,3!Lc5!Ll14!Lj[$spx]] dabum