SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Eric who wrote (55066)9/7/2001 2:56:35 PM
From: Eric  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 77397
 
Anyway you all have a good weekend. I'm going up to my 2nd home in the San Juans "that Cisco built" for the weekend.

Gads... I just hope we don't melt down on monday!

Eric



To: Eric who wrote (55066)9/7/2001 2:58:06 PM
From: Stock Farmer  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 77397
 
Eric, Too many people want to own it? Actually, I think it's more like too many people do.

Cisco is closing towards magic numbers. Has been now for months. Which smacks of artifice in the price. Not rational valuation, but folks who "feel" that they want to buy it at a particular price.

The public is remarkably succeptible right now because there isn't a metric of value it can hang it's hat on except "x% lower than a whole bunch of folks bought it at earlier". Kind of like a sale in a furniture store.

Valuation is not on the minds of the public, and while we beat it to death on this thread a while back (there are a few of us staunch valuers here), we seem to be an exception.

They used to have a tool. Like old Macdonald's farm, here a PEG there a PEG every where a PEG PEG... But as G went to zero they had to throw that away and I really haven't seen much of PEG lately. Economic analysis is harder and the public needs an easy measure. And I think the next one they adopt will be a conservative one. But I don't know what it is, and as far as I know it could be just as viable and "fair" a metric as PEG was back then -ng-

When the one they choose steps up to the plate, well, I fear that we won't see Cisco hold the line so readily.

So I'll be looking for its strange attractor to move well off dollar lines and start following news. As opposed to jumping up and down by $1.00.

John.



To: Eric who wrote (55066)9/7/2001 3:00:20 PM
From: JakeStraw  Respond to of 77397
 
>>Cisco doesn't want to fall. Too many people want to own it

We're still in the early innings...CSCO still might not have bottomed.



To: Eric who wrote (55066)9/7/2001 3:55:59 PM
From: SouthFloridaGuy  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 77397
 
<<Yep
Cisco doesn't want to fall.

Too many people want to own it.>>

I have never heard anything more ludicrous in my life, and believe me I have heard plenty of idiotic BS on this thread.