SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Semi Equipment Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Sun Tzu who wrote (1139)9/10/2001 5:12:46 PM
From: scott_jiminez  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 95530
 
There's another possible interpretation, ST, using a more robust 10 year average.

From 1992 -> 1998, AMAT, NVLS, and KLAC maintained p/s ratios between 2 and 4. Generally speaking, these stocks would peak at a p/s of 3.5 - 4 and would bottom at 1.5 - 2. However, starting in 1999, these large-cap stocks took on bubble-like valuations, shifting their range from 2 - 4 to 4 - 8. While we all can agree the bubble has burst big time, AMAT, NVLS, and KLAC maintain their bubble-like valuations.

None of this applies to KLIC: the stock has maintained a p/s between 0.5 and 2 for a decade and it continues to reside in that range.

Based on this analysis, AMAT, KLAC, and NVLS may be headed for a ~50% fall to reach even the higher range of the mean of non-bubble valuations. KLIC, on the other hand, is well within it normal 'contraction' range and thus may be poised to rally from these levels.

Another perspective: if the equipment stocks did indeed make a bottom in December, 2000, KLIC's p/s at the time was completely consistent with its historical bottom whereas the p/s of KLAC, NVLS, and AMAT was 1.5 to 5+ times the average bottom p/s level reached during the previous 8 years.

To state the obvious once again: the large-cap stocks are completely out of sync with the bubble correction that has occurred in the rest of the market. This does not necessarily mean the situation will be corrected any time soon. But the valuation discrepancy is a fact...and may be a disaster waiting to happen for the large cap equipment stocks.



To: Sun Tzu who wrote (1139)9/10/2001 8:28:55 PM
From: Gottfried  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 95530
 
ST, here's how the numbers are calculated...

P/E and P/S are calculated over the past four quarters; PEG compares the past four quarters to the previous four.
• P/E is most recent stock price (previous day's close) divided by cumulative earnings per share (EPS) from the four most recently reported quarters.
• P/S is most recent stock price (previous day's close) divided by cumulative sales per share from the four most recently reported quarters.