Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Guidance and Visibility -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Susan G who wrote (15880)	9/11/2001 10:51:41 PM
From: quasi-geezer	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 208838

I am not at all displease with the president today he should not say anything that he does not want to back up or anything that is not substantiated ... He should be a calming force at a time like that, and he is, I do not want to see him jumping up and down and yell kill the murders ... what do you think Gore will do under the same situation ...

To: Susan G who wrote (15880)	9/11/2001 11:14:59 PM
From: juliare	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 208838

Yes, it would be very reassuring to have Clinton biting his lip with a tear in his eye and a quiver in his voice. He'd probably want psychological counseling for the poor misunderstood terrorists. Anyone who would expect the President to tip his hand publicly, with terrorists perhaps still in the country and information still forthcoming and events still unfolding, is nuts. So far as Bush being removed to Nebraska--duh. With terrorist planes in the air, imagine the effect on the country if he just blindly flew into Andrews, and was shot down or attacked in the air. Obviously certain security measures went into effect and he was kept safe until the situation was examined. That drill has probably been in place since WWII for god's sake.