SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Classic TA Workplace -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Ken98 who wrote (13127)9/12/2001 10:03:33 AM
From: AllansAlias  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 209892
 
In the 1993(?) bombing of the WTC the insurance companies were on the hook for hundreds of millions. I am reading that this is not a good time for the insurers, but I sure would welcome somebody with some expertise in the area to contribute.



To: Ken98 who wrote (13127)9/12/2001 10:20:12 AM
From: Challo Jeregy  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 209892
 
I heard all of these things talked about on CNBC late last night and earlier this morning.

Remember thinking about the new owner of the buildings when they talked about him - he is probably bk now - I think they said he had recently moved into the building also - Bloomfeld, Bloomburg, something like that.

re: insurance - also mentioned the war clauses and how insurance companies will likely contest claims . . .



To: Ken98 who wrote (13127)9/12/2001 10:30:34 AM
From: marginmike  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 209892
 
net lease for 3.2 billion, work comp too. I would assume WTC would have terrorism rider unless you were smoking crack