Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Win Smith who wrote (54636)	9/13/2001 12:23:23 AM
From: jamok99	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 275872

Win, Re:<<Afghanistan is an easy target for retaliation, but Afghanistan is, by all indications, such a miserable place at this point, it's hard to see how anything short of nuclear attack would show up on the screen there.>> First, thanks for your thoughts. I wanted to make clear that I don't know that Afghanistan was responsible for this atrocity. Indeed, it points up that if the US does retaliate, it needs to be very sure of it's evidence before doing so - in the same sense that a death sentence in legal proceedings in the US require proof beyond a reasonable doubt - lynchings, while emotionally satisfying, make us just as heinous as those who would indiscriminately destroy innocent people in expressing their pathological rage. Jamok