SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Impeach George W. Bush -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Patricia Trinchero who wrote (6696)9/16/2001 12:28:30 AM
From: Mephisto  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 93284
 
Why do they hate us so badly? It's beyond comprehension.

Various people would give many reasons.

It is important to note the religious importance of sacred land to the Muslims. Bin Laden tunred
violent against the US only when King Fahd of Saudia Arabia invited the Us to help
defend the oil-producing countries against an invasion by Irag. (I've been away so that is why the response is so late, but while I've been away, I have never been that far from the tv, and I have cried with the rest of America.

This information was in The New York Times

September 14, 2001

THE SUSPECT

Bin Laden: Child of Privilege Who Champions Holy War

"Mr. bin Laden turned violently anti- American in 1990
after King Fahd invited the United States and its allies to station forces in
Saudi Arabia to help defend the oil-producing kingdom against an invasion
by Iraq. The presence of American soldiers in Saudi Arabia, the birthplace
of the Prophet Muhammad and the home of the two holiest Muslim shrines,
enraged Mr. bin Laden and other Arab militants. Over time, they increasingly
came to blame the United States for Muslim woes, among them oppression
of Palestinians by Israel."

By JUDITH MILLER

W ith his gentle eyes, skeletal frame,
long black beard and habitual
Kalashnikov, Osama bin Laden has become
the world's most reviled symbol of terror.

While his connection to this week's
devastating attacks in New York and Washington has yet to be definitively
established, his image has evolved in the last decade from that of financier of
terror to its most prominent promoter, catalyst and mastermind.

His goal has been consistent for a decade: victory in a self-proclaimed jihad,
or Islamic holy war, against the United States and its allies. Now he is
suspected of having added thousands of new deaths to an already impressive
terrorist toll.

As he has done before, Mr. bin Laden summoned Arab reporters on
Wednesday to a compound in Afghanistan to deny responsibility for the
stunning strikes while praising those who conducted them.

American intelligence officials now dismiss such denials. While they once
debated Mr. bin Laden's specific connection to the terrorism his networks
have spawned, they now acknowledge that this frail, squeaky- voiced Saudi
has mobilized hundreds of Muslims in far-flung countries to fight and die for
his embittered vision of Islam, if not for him.

But while government experts no longer dispute his influence, they do take
issue with many of the myths that have been cultivated about him.

Though he styles himself as a humble man of the Muslim people, he is, in
fact, an unlikely spokesman for the oppressed and dispossessed. Born in the
mid-1950's, the youngest of some 20 sons of a Yemeni-born Saudi
construction magnate, he enjoyed a youth of wealth and privilege. While
many Saudis of his era sweltered in the desert sun, he had air-conditioned
houses and private stables, and was pampered by servants. His father's close
ties to King Faisal of Saudi Arabia won the family business rich contracts to
rebuild mosques in Mecca and Medina. After his father's death in 1968, Mr.
bin Laden inherited some $300 million.

Mr. bin Laden, who graduated from King Abdul Aziz University in Jidda in
1979 with a degree in civil engineering, was not always interested in religious
politics. Associates portrayed him as a frequent visitor with Saudi royalty to
Beirut, where he drank heavily at night clubs and wound up in bar brawls.

He has said he was galvanized by three events in the late 1970's: the Camp
David peace accords between Egypt and Israel, the overthrow of the Shah
of Iran in a radical Islamic revolution, and the Soviet incursion in Afghanistan.
"I was enraged," he told the newspaper Al Quds al Arabi.


He spent the first years of the Afghanistan war traveling to raise money for
the jihad against the Soviets. He moved to the Pakistani border town of
Peshawar in 1984, by which time Soviet forces were encountering fierce
opposition from Afghan guerrillas.

Mr. bin Laden's money earned him instant access and popularity. Abdullah
Anas, a former Algerian ally who later fell out with him, said that while he
was not "very sophisticated politically or organizationally," he was an activist
with "great imagination." And above all, he said, he was very generous: "He'd
give you his clothes."

Mr. Anas said that in Afghanistan, Mr. bin Laden fell under the influence of
the Egyptian Islamic Jihad, seasoned militants who had helped assassinate
President Anwar el-Sadat in 1981. They persuaded him that the jihad had to
be expanded to other Muslims who were living under autocratic "infidel"
regimes.

In 1986, Mr. bin Laden established the first of more than a dozen training
camps he would eventually sponsor in Afghanistan, Mr. Anas and intelligence
officials said.

About a year later, with the tide turning against the Soviets, he and the
Egyptians founded Al Qaeda, the group base from which they hoped to
stage their global Islamic crusade.

Euphoric about their victory over the Soviets, Mr. bin Laden and his
extremist allies concluded that no secular state could defeat holy warriors.
He opened more camps and spent more of his personal fortune, much of
which the United States and its allies have now frozen, to help finance
training and indoctrination to produce militants for the new borderless jihad.

While the United States had worked alongside him to help oust the Russians
from Afghanistan, Mr. bin Laden turned violently anti- American in 1990
after King Fahd invited the United States and its allies to station forces in
Saudi Arabia to help defend the oil-producing kingdom against an invasion
by Iraq. The presence of American soldiers in Saudi Arabia, the birthplace
of the Prophet Muhammad and the home of the two holiest Muslim shrines,
enraged Mr. bin Laden and other Arab militants. Over time, they increasingly
came to blame the United States for Muslim woes, among them oppression
of Palestinians by Israel.


After Saudi intelligence officials caught Mr. bin Laden smuggling weapons
from Yemen, they withdrew his passport and pressed him into leaving the
country. Mr. bin Laden made his way to Sudan, where, once again, his
money earned him a warm welcome.

After the 1993 World Trade Center bombing by Muslim militants, some of
whom had ties to Mr. bin Laden's network, American intelligence began
focusing more intently on him.

After two terrorist attacks on Americans in Saudi Arabia in 1996, at least
one of which was attributed to Mr. bin Laden, the Americans pressed Sudan
to expel him. He found fertile ground for his jihad in Afghanistan, and two
years later, his Qaeda organization formed an international militant Muslim
coalition that formally declared that it was "the duty" of Muslims everywhere
to kill Americans.

Since then, members of his network have been tied to at least a dozen
successful or failed attacks that he ordered. Until now, the most deadly was
the 1998 twin bombings of American embassies in Africa and the attack in
Yemen on the American destroyer Cole in October 2000, in which 17
sailors died.

[In Dallas, F.B.I. officials said yesterday that they were seeking the former
leader of the Islamic Society of Arlington, Tex., for questioning in Tuesday's
attacks, the Associated Press reported. The man, Moataz al- Hallak, 40, has
been under scrutiny for several years because of his link to Wadih el-Hage,
who this year was convicted of conspiring with Mr. bin Laden for his role in
the bombings of American embassies in Africa.]

After the Clinton administration attacked Mr. bin Laden's camps in
Afghanistan and a pharmaceutical plant in Sudan in response to his
bombings, Mr. bin Laden issued another warning. America, he said, was
weak. "The battle," he said, had not yet begun.

nytimes.com



To: Patricia Trinchero who wrote (6696)9/16/2001 12:34:58 AM
From: Mephisto  Respond to of 93284
 
It is important to understand the mind and the motives of the terrorist. Traditional warfare will never
defeat them. Afghanistan has never been defeated. It is important to realize that the people would
never submit to an American coalition. Reform must come from within the country. Only then might
the Taliban be defeated. JMOP- Mephisto

I believe this article is important because we can begin to understand how they think- Mephisto

'If they declare war on us, so what?'

The friend and mentor of Osama bin Laden tells The Globe's GEOFFREY
YORK that the 'paranoid' Americans can only lose by bombing Afghanistan,
which is just a heap of rubble and mud houses. 'The people there cannot lose
any more than they already have. Anti-American feeling will rise so high that it
won't be safe for Americans to be here'

By GEOFFREY YORK
From The Globe and Mail (Toronto, Ontario, Canada)
Saturday, September 15, 2001 – Print
Edition, Page F3

AKORA KHATTAK, PAKISTAN --
Maulana Sami-ul-Haq has trained more Taliban leaders than any other man
on Earth. He is a long-time friend of the accused terrorist Osama bin Laden,
the most wanted fugitive on the planet. But he also wants you to know that
he has a jolly sense of humour.

He is a man who enjoys a chuckle at the expense of his Western visitors. He
gets a laugh from their startled reaction when he calls out the name of
Osama, one of his eight sons from his two wives. "They get frightened," he
says slyly.

Even though the bearded mullah is merely calling for a glass of tea from his
15-year-old son, he enjoys seeing how the Westerners always look around
nervously, as if expecting the accused Saudi terrorist to cross the threshold
at any moment. "They are so scared of Osama bin Laden," he says, finding
amusement in the thought.

They might also be frightened of the mullah himself, since he has endorsed
bin Laden's 1998 fatwa (religious ruling) that calls on Muslims to kill
Americans at every opportunity. Yet he seems an oddly gentle and friendly
soul, scoffing at their nervousness. "America is much too frightened of
Osama bin Laden," he says.

"It is exaggerating the threat from him. Even on New Year's Eve, there was
supposedly a threat from him. They put guards everywhere and they
couldn't even celebrate New Year's Eve. What can you say about that kind
of paranoia?"

He acknowledges, however, that many of his followers were ecstatic at the
terrorist attacks in New York and Washington this week. "Muslims are
suffering from American policies, and that's why they were so happy," he
says.

Ominously, he predicts that the expected American military retaliation will
provoke a massive international war. "Their bombing will just ignite a fire.
The Americans had such trouble extinguishing even a small fire at the
Pentagon. This will be a much bigger fire, and they will never extinguish it."

Maulana (the title means "our master") Sami-ul-Haq is the chancellor of the
most influential Muslim religious seminary in Pakistan. Some have called it
the jihad factory -- a breeding ground of the holy warriors who spew hatred
at America from terrorist training camps in Afghanistan.

His madrassa,Darul Uloom Haqqania, has produced eight Taliban cabinet
ministers and thousands of other soldiers and officials of the Taliban, the
Islamic purists who control 95 per cent of Afghanistan's territory.

Inside its walls, about 3,000 young men and boys are learning a stern, harsh
brand of Islam. It is an ideology that promotes violent hatred of America.
The madrassa is a palatial compound on the bustling Grand Trunk Road of
northwestern Pakistan, not far from the Khyber Pass. Its network is vast,
and its ambitions are global. It attracts applications from 10,000 boys and
young men every year. As well as educating the Taliban, the madrassa is
training thousands of students from Central Asian republics such as
Uzbekistan and Kazakhstan, from Turkey, from China, from the Russian
separatist region of Chechnya, and of course from Pakistan itself. If its
influence continues to spread, the madrassa -- and thousands of similar
madrassas in Pakistan and Afghanistan -- could promote uprisings and
takeovers by Islamic militants in a broad arc of territory across the world.

The students are desperately poor, often from Afghan refugee families. By
attending the madrassa, they get free meals, free lodging and free
textbooks. But in exchange they give up almost any thought of secular life.
Non-Islamic subjects are rarely taught. Television and radio are
discouraged. Boys as young as 8 spend the entire day memorizing the
Koran, in Arabic, even though most do not understand the Arabic language.
(Most speak Pashto, the local language of northern Pakistan and much of
Afghanistan.) In this climate of total control, an ideology of
anti-Americanism is easy to inculcate into young impressionable minds.

A visit to the madrassa this week found the 63-year-old chancellor
receiving a delegation of Egyptian scholars. He sat on a carpet, surrounded
by his followers, chatting amiably with the Egyptian visitors. Later, he moved
to his office, where his aides gave tea and pastry to the Western journalists
who wanted his opinion on the terrorist attacks in the United States.

Birds were chirping outside his window, and the sound of the mid-afternoon
call to prayers drifted hauntingly into the room from the madrassa's
blue-tiled mosque nearby. A green Islamic flag stood on the table in front of
him, and a map of Afghanistan was on the wall. A security guard, armed
with an automatic rifle, was stationed in an office nearby.

It doesn't take much prompting to get Sami-ul-Haq to explain what he sees
as the rational basis for the anti-American hatred that fuels the Islamic
extremists. When he hears the first question on the terrorist attacks, he
immediately begins a long speech about the Jews who, he says, are pushing
the American government into an anti-Muslim war.

"Jews and Christians are fighting against Muslims, but it is the Jews who
have the most antagonistic policy toward Muslims," he says. "The Jews have
so much control over the United States, and their people are in so many
positions, that they have a stranglehold over America and Europe too. The
U.S. election was an example of how the Jews can manipulate everything in
the United States. If anyone goes against them, they create a conspiracy to
stop it."

American leaders have proclaimed that the terrorist attacks are the
beginning of the first war of the 21st century. But from Sami-ul-Haq's
perspective, the war has been raging for a long time, and it was the United
States that launched the war against the Muslim world. This, he says, is the
source of the venom and hatred that motivates many of his followers.

"We are already in a state of war. Without declaring war, the Americans are
undermining our sovereignty. You can see Afghan refugees in Pakistan who
are suffering from American policies. The American policy is to establish its
superiority all over the world and make itself the only superpower. They
want to seize all economic, political and military control. If they declare war
on us, so what? Pakistan is already so dependent on them that we have to
ask the World Bank for permission when we set the price of potatos."

The war, he makes clear, is a global one. He recites a long list of Muslim
grievances around the world: Iraqi and Afghan children dying of hunger
because of U.S.-led sanctions; Palestinians dying in air strikes by
U.S.-backed Israeli forces; American troops stationed on the sacred Islamic
holy land of Saudi Arabia. Even non-Muslim countries such as China and
Japan are growing resentful of the U.S. military presence on their soil and in
their airspace, he says.

"They are all the victims and targets of U.S. economic policy. The
Americans want to impose a new world order. Muslims are the only power
opposing that. Muslims cannot accept any world domination. Islam is
growing everywhere, it has become very strong in Europe and it is spreading
very fast in the United States. That's why the Americans are doing
everything possible to stop it. But whenever anyone opposes the United
States, they are called terrorists."

As he speaks, he adjusts his grey-and-white turban and gestures with his
spectacles, sometimes interrupting the interview to speak into a red plastic
1970s-style telephone.

He sticks to the official Taliban line: The terrorism attacks had nothing to do
with Osama bin Laden, all terrorism should be condemned and the United
States should investigate properly and find clear proof of who is guilty
before it takes any action. He even hints that American terrorists may have
been responsible, since the hijackers could not have flown over the
Pentagon "unless they had an insider with them."

Like many in this region, he notes that Osama bin Laden himself was
supported by the United States when he was fighting against the Soviet army
in Afghanistan in the 1980s.

"Osama was a hero to them. America was very happy with him, because he
spent millions of dollars on the war against the Soviets. But then the
Americans took control of everything in Saudi Arabia -- its resources and
oil -- and stationed their military there. It was almost the same as the Soviet
occupation of Afghanistan. Osama bin Laden fought the Soviets and now, in
the same way, he is fighting the Americans."

Bin Laden, he says, is moving around between caves and mud houses in
Afghanistan, with his movements watched and restricted by the Taliban.

"He doesn't have the capacity to do this. He doesn't even have telephones.
But America needs an evil figure. They want to keep him alive, to use the
myth of him to keep control of Saudi Arabia and other countries. They are
blaming Muslims to justify an attack on Afghanistan and Pakistan."

Sami-ul-Haq is not just a religious leader. He also heads a pro-Taliban
faction of a radical Islamic party, the Jamiat-Ulema-Islami. He is a former
Pakistani senator. And he is president of the Afghanistan Defence Council, a
coalition that includes secular groups as well as religious organizations. (He
has called a meeting of the coalition for Monday to discuss how to respond
if the United States launches military strikes on Afghanistan.)

"Afghanistan is a heap of rubble and mud houses," he says. "There is nothing
there, only hunger. The Taliban are facing deep troubles. Why would they
attack America? If the United States bombs Afghanistan, the people there
cannot lose any more than they already have. It is the Americans who will
lose. Anti-American feeling will rise so high that it won't be safe for
Americans to be here."

globeandmail.



To: Patricia Trinchero who wrote (6696)9/16/2001 12:50:41 AM
From: Mephisto  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 93284
 
We will also find that while people found the attacks on the US appaling there is a great deal of
anti-American sentiment at our borders. -Mephisto

POSTED AT 11:45 AM EDT Saturday, September 15

Wente: They had it coming?

By MARGARET WENTE
From Saturday's Globe and Mail, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

"The Americans are reaping the fruits of
their crimes against humanity."

That's Saddam Hussein speaking. But you don't have to go to Baghdad to
hear such views. Just hang around any college campus. Or chat with your
well-heeled neighbours in downtown Toronto. Anti-American sentiment is
nearly as popular among Canadians -- especially well-heeled ones -- as
Starbucks lattes.

You'd think anti-Americanism would have gone discreetly underground this
week. Not so. My inbox is crammed with e-mail such as the following: "The
values that I venerate as a Canadian are not the same as those values
venerated by Americans. Where is your indignation when NATO bombs
Iraq or when the CIA perpetrates deathly intrigues worldwide every day?"

The anti-Americans, of course, don't believe that the thousands of innocent
people who were blown to smithereens deserved to die. They're as horrified
as anyone at the carnage. But they also believe the United States was asking
for it.

One first-year student at a leading university described her political science
class this week. "Everyone was saying it's a terrible thing, but America
brought it on itself because it's against the other countries," she said. "The
whole attitude was: America sucks." There was no other point of view
expressed. The professor didn't bother to suggest there might be one.

At first, I thought these rants against America were confined to the usual
anti-globalization crowd. But here's a sampling of opinion culled from
lawyers, managers, teachers and various other people in Toronto:

"Isn't this really a symbol for people's discontent all over the world?"

"Well, what do they expect? They've been messing about in everyone's
business. The only thing that's shocking is that it took so long."

"What goes around comes around. It's hubris."

I don't think these views represent the majority of Canadians. Certainly, the
cafeteria lady, the liquor-store clerk and the guy who fixes my plumbing
don't blame the victim. They're outraged. Their attitude is: "Terrorism must
be stopped, so that this never happens again." They think that the United
States must strike back and that Canada ought to help them.

But what do they know? Among the more sophisticated set, people say,
"They should have known this was coming," and "Retaliation will make it
worse." I heard well-meaning people phone in to CBC talk shows to ask
just what it was America did, anyway, because they weren't exactly sure. I
heard other well-meaning people describe the attack as an act of
"misdirected anger," as if the suicide hijackers had been badly informed, and
if only someone had sat down and explained things properly to them, they
would have changed their minds.

It hadn't occurred to them that there are some people in the world who hate
us and want us dead because they believe Western civilization is profoundly
corrupt.

The bill of indictment against the United States is both very vague and very
specific. Some people blame the gap between rich and poor, which the U.S.
is either inadvertently or advertently responsible for creating. The feeling is
that the poor are so desperate, so hopeless and so oppressed that it's not
surprising they would lash out like this.

Other people blame the long record of alleged U.S. atrocities abroad,
including its efforts to overthrow Fidel Castro, the war in Vietnam, the
secret war in Cambodia, its support for various strongmen and dictators, the
Persian Gulf war, the oppression of Palestinians, the deliberate starvation of
Iraqi children etc. etc. They also like to argue that the CIA trained and
backed Osama bin Laden in the first place, so it serves them right. (History
professor John Kirton, at the University of Toronto, says the links weren't
close, but a popular theory circulating on the Internet says the CIA really did
it.)

Most kids have not mastered the bill of indictment in very much detail.
Nonetheless, they know for a fact that America sucks, and that George W.
Bush really sucks. "The kids in my school won't stop talking about how they
hate the U.S.," says a young woman I know. Her Grade 12 classmates are
multicultural children of the intelligentsia. "They think it's intellectually
sophisticated. It means, 'I'm cynical, I'm hard.' "

Her generation has embraced anti-racism and multiculturalism. They believe
in tolerance and respect for difference. But they have not been taught to
believe that some values are better than others. "Sometimes, I'd like to ask
them what would happen if a country like Afghanistan had the power the
U.S. has," she says. "But you can't bring that up because it's perceived as
racist."

Among these kids, reflexive anti-Americanism is as much a fashion
statement as the jeans they wear. Their teachers haven't challenged their
beliefs. Their parents haven't, either. Chances are their teachers and their
parents think George Bush sucks, too. They've all been raised in a country
where recreational bitching at the United States is just as much fun as going
to Disney World. And they've never learned how much their lives depend
on the liberal democratic values our nations share.

It's not just Muslims who are afraid of being stigmatized by mindless
prejudice. So is any kid who's not entirely sure that George Bush sucks.
"My American friend who's a student here has been crying all week long,"
says the first-year student at the first-rate university. "That's all she's heard."

It probably wouldn't do any good for these girls to remind their friends that
Saddam Hussein is a warmonger who attacked four countries before the
Americans moved against him, or that he's a mass murderer who did not
hesitate to gas his own women and children, or that he was a hair away from
being able to make a nuclear bomb and chemical weapons, which he would
have been most happy to use on all the rest of us. It wouldn't help them to
point out that the United States imposed a virtuous peace after the Second
World War, and converted Germany and Japan into robust democracies.
Or that Canada is full of countless Afghans and Pakistanis and Muslims from
many nations who are here because they want what we have, not what they
had in the lands they left behind.

It probably wouldn't do any good for them to remind their friends that the
people who perished in the World Trade Center and the Pentagon were
doing work that makes it possible to go shopping at the Gap whenever we
want, with money in our pockets and without fear for our personal safety.
Work that makes it possible to express any political belief you want and not
get locked up.

They're just kids, of course, so I guess you can forgive them for their
ignorant prejudice against America. But the grownups -- the many, many
grownups -- should know better.

globeandmail.