Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Right Wing Extremist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: CVJ who wrote (16457)	9/12/2001 9:01:28 PM
From: Carolyn	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 59480

Is this possible? Message 16341134

To: CVJ who wrote (16457)	9/12/2001 9:06:47 PM
From: PROLIFE	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 59480

I just choose to believe that three is all that could effectively storm a small cabin area such as the cockpit, or down the Isle, and get anything done without just running over one another.

To: CVJ who wrote (16457)	9/12/2001 9:18:14 PM
From: Lane3	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 59480

Nobody said why only the three participated. We know that there were ONLY three. The three we know of were probably sitting together and able to communicate only by furtive gestures or glances. With the cabin under the control of the terrorists, certainly no one could stand up in the aisle and ask for volunteers. Once the three moved, others may have joined. Or maybe there was another group of three or four that acted before the three we know about did. We have no way to know who or how many acted. All we know is that there were at least three who were prepared to act and that someone acted. Effectively. Karen