Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Steve's Channelling Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jdaasoc who wrote (27238)	9/13/2001 12:19:19 AM
From: Boplicity	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 30051

re: asbestos contamination us.news2.yimg.com I was surprised and continue to be surprised by the lack of protection being used or thought of for the rescue and media personal. Also, why didn't anyone in command position think of the building collapsing? B

To: Jdaasoc who wrote (27238)	9/13/2001 10:32:30 AM
From: Bosco	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 30051

<ot>Hi John - no flame from me, but one has to wonder Now it get me wondering what CSCO gets for their $4 M donation. if the donor is looking for returns, then it is not really donation. No, I am not that naive. A lot of donors do look for returns, say, an alum gives the school $$$ so the family name is forever enshrined at some Auditorium. I can't speak for you, but my guess is that there are many generous people here [in this thread] who dough out $$$ regularly, especially in times like this, even when they worry their investments may take a turn for the worst if everyone gives in to panic attacks and thinks the end of the world is nigh. Sure, this is investment forum, so maybe looking at the world with an investment angle is appropriate, but maybe there are enough people left stupid enough to look pass that. Just a guess best, Bosco