SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Mu Gamma Lambda -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Original Mad Dog who wrote (6642)9/13/2001 4:50:19 PM
From: HG  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 10077
 
Has it ever occured to anyone that Talibaan and Ladin may not be responsible for this at all ?

It would be interesting to speculate who else could have done this ?



To: Original Mad Dog who wrote (6642)9/13/2001 4:51:57 PM
From: Oral Roberts  Respond to of 10077
 
My problem is that I hold them personally responsible for this if bin Laden is to blame. He has been proven to be responsible for other atrocities up to this point and yet they have shielded him. I think they understood President Bush the same way I did the other night and they are afraid. I truly hope they have reason for that fear.



To: Original Mad Dog who wrote (6642)9/13/2001 6:21:29 PM
From: Alan Smithee  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 10077
 
, I think one response to that is....how about we have the trial in an American court but apply Islamic law?

That could work.

What's the penalty under Sharia for murder? I do believe it is death.



To: Original Mad Dog who wrote (6642)9/13/2001 9:09:03 PM
From: arno  Respond to of 10077
 
He's definitely their "get out of jail" card.

It would buy them time and he's tainted goods now.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News