Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Stock Attack II - A Complete Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: stomper who wrote (18757)	9/14/2001 11:02:33 AM
From: Trumptown	Respond to of 52237

That's fine and a good idea...my only point was that punishing the airlines for being a victim of an 'act of war' is over the top... SR

To: stomper who wrote (18757)	9/14/2001 11:05:31 AM
From: JRI	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 52237

<More than gas station attendents> Dave, I remain amazed that almost no news organizations are picking up on this.....this WAS the weakest link here. It would have been virtually impossible to carry out this attack w/o the sorry-a$$ cockpit security that the airlines knew was an accident waiting to happen. We'll never have a building secure enough to prevent a bomb attempt, nor be able to fully prevent a dedicate well-organized suicide bomber, nor prevent every incidence of someone sneaking a weapon on a plane....but waltzing into the cockpit? We should have seen that coming, and this is not monday-morning quarterbacking.. They don't get in the cockpit, and the entire WTC tragedy would have been avoided.