Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Zeev's Turnips -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Knighty Tin who wrote (486)	9/17/2001 9:39:55 AM
From: JRI	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 644

MB- Agreed. Taliban have to now hire foreignors to fight their battles...they do not have an unlimited supply of troops...also, this could turn out to be a 3 front war for them (Pakistan border), Kabul/Northern Alliance front, and wherever the U.S. winds up within country. That is a stretch for a group with troops in the small number that Taliban has. Correct if I'm wrong, but against the Russians, the "freedom fighters" never tried to protect the border, right? (or, if they did, rather unsuccessfully I'd assume)..their real success was in getting the Russians to attack them in the hills and be sitting ducks below...a certain-type of fighting.......Trying to defend the Pakistan border is not where there expertise lies, IMO. Holding serve will be not so easy, however, there is going to be heavy losses on all sides, no doubt.