SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jerome who wrote (52921)9/23/2001 4:48:33 PM
From: Zeev Hed  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 70976
 
Jerome, get your facts straight, more than 50% of the funding for humanitarian agencies that are (or should I say, were) operating in Afghanistan came from the US, at least according to a recent interview I heard on CNN. It is not US soldiers that shoot women down for not wearing the proper dress, for teaching girls in hiding and for such huge transgression as "infidelity" (by the way, even the Kuran requires four (not two as the bible requires) eye witnesses to adultery (the actual act of intercourse, mind you, not a Clinton like cigar) to carry on a death sentence, show me one case where such four witnesses were brought to the fore), these are young men (most orphaned from the Soviet/Afghan conflict) that where indoctrinated into such barbarism. I have not seen any Tutu from Rwanda taking a plane and crushing it into Paris, their condition is even more deplorable than that of the Afghan or Iraqi. Now you'll tell me you got to "understand" these orphans, they suffered a lot from the war. Well my friend, it is up to the society that take cares of these orphans to direct their anger and pain into positive outlets, not the terrorizing of their own people. Europe was left with just as many orphans after WWII, and none of these took loaded planes to crash them into major population areas of countries that are not even close to the cause of their misery. The tragedies in Afghanistan and Iraq are of their own making, Saddam did not have to invade Kuwait, use chemical weapons on its own Kurd population and in its war with Iran, and the various factions in Afghanistan could have chosen to talk to each other rather than fight for ever for power. If we allowed such a tyrannical government in our own country, we would end up with massive starvation as well.

Zeev



To: Jerome who wrote (52921)9/23/2001 7:15:57 PM
From: Mike M  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 70976
 
Jerome, I am disappointed in your post. Despite your purported experience in the Peace Corps it is apparent you are unaware who,in fact, is providing a large percentage of the relief food to Afghanistan.

Furthermore, it wasn't starving Afghanis that blew up mothers and fathers and even children in airplanes, the WTC and the Pentagon. It was in fact well fed and well financed terrorist whose goals are to spread their brand of hatred to the world. They want nothing more than to create revolution in every country of the world to undermine current world order. Misery loves company and these people are miserable human beings. The Taliban have for years successfully delivered their own countrymen into famine and pestilence.

You suggest that somehow the US should learn something from this. It is as if we really did deserve to have our airlines converted into human missiles and our hugely populated buildings into mince meat.

I am sure we learned something from all of this. Perhaps what we should learn is that there are people out there who are inherently evil and we must learn to combat them at every level. Not because we intend to return evil with evil but because we have no choice. They kill without regard to any form of humanity that we understand.

Jerome, I am curious, what is it you think the Taliban and Osama Bin Laden should teach us which is truly worthy of learning?