SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Gorilla and King Portfolio Candidates -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: chaz who wrote (47043)9/24/2001 2:27:47 AM
From: Maurice Winn  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 54805
 
Chaz, There isn't going to be another hijacking of an aircraft. That horse has bolted. It's too late to shut the stable door. That's why they did all at once, in a big hit. They knew it was a oncer. Any hijacker that announces his intention to go to Havana from now on is going to be buried in an avalanche of duty free bottles of booze [which hurt heads when they land, especially if wielded by a baseball player who happens to be on the plane], hot water, carry on bags [to protect against knife wounds], fists, and everything else. Everyone now knows that if you don't fight back, you die. So they'll offer resistance and fast!

If the hijackers thought they could do it more than once, they would have scheduled one a month so that just as everyone was getting over the first one, they'd be hit with another.

Any Arab-looking passengers [especially if there are more than one of them on a flight] are going to get the three times over inspection and to hell with the politically-correct anti-profiling business. Grandmothers with walking sticks and taking their grandchild on a trip, who grew up in Britain are not terrorist risks [unless they are Catholic Irish in which case their walking stick probably has a sword, gun, Semtex, sarin or the like in it].

I wonder what people of this thread would think of somebody who had sent money to Osama to help with the freedom fight so the one true religion can be ascendant. I wonder what they think of Irish Americans who gave money to Gerry Adams to help with the freedom fight so the one true religion can be ascendant. I wonder if Irish Americans can see the parallel or are they even now making their monthly direct debit to help the next bombing. There was a car bomb just a month before WTC cbsnews.com
<The IRA is observing a cease-fire, but the peace process is opposed by a dissident group, the so-called Real IRA, which has been blamed for a series of explosions in the province and in Britain. On Wednesday, soldiers defused a 45-pound car bomb outside Belfast International Airport, believed to have been planted by the Real IRA.>

catholic.org
<Gerry Adams, the president of Sinn Fein, said "I condemn the bombing without any equivocation whatsoever." It was the first time he had condemned a Republican bombing. >

It's interesting that Omagh and Osama nearly rhyme. I wonder how many readers know about Omagh.

Some of the war against terrorism could take place right there in the USA. For example, Bill Clinton's direct debits could be checked [he's allegedly an Irish American]. There are others in SI who know people personally who send money to the IRA. They are the front line in the war against terrorism. Cobalt Blue is one such person. The IRA killed and maimed a family of New Zealand tourists in the Tower of London [a purely tourist interest]. Those Irish Americans who have given money to the IRA should be as pleased with themselves as those people who funded the WTC destruction. Those who are 'friends of' or 'know some people' who give money to the IRA are in the terrorist bomb club. I expect the children of Omagh feel pain as much as the children of WTC or children of Oklahoma [good grief, there's another rhyme - Osama, Omagh, Oklahoma ... X file time].

I would love to read that there were a whole bunch of Irish Americans working on one of the top floors in the WTC building who were planning another rally for Gerry Adams or The Real IRA. Every one of them would save some other innocent IRA victim's life

It's nauseating to read that Jacques Chirac claims that France is one of the countries which is against terrorism and has always been. France, under that international state terrorist Mitterrand, [may he fry in hell for a billion years], conducted the only terrorist attack in New Zealand [other than a suitcase bomb at a union office which killed one person].

<I wouldn't count Gulfstream out so quickly...private aviation is far more secure than the airlines, and executives don't have to waste extra hours waiting to check through security. I'll bet that prices of used corporate jets, turboprops and heavy twins will rise rapidly for a while.>

I think people will quickly figure out that travel on airlines is not something to worry about. There should be space available right now! Queues at airports will quickly be reduced as airlines figure that if they cause huge delays they will lose business to more efficient airlines which provide plenty of security to avoid delays.

Given the financial downturns and dot.gones, I guess the corporate jet market is way down. The wealth effect is a distant memory now for nearly everyone.

It's time to watch for danger elsewhere now.

Mqurice

PS: It used to seem absurd to me that airlines left the cockpit open to anyone to wander in. I've sat just behind cockpits and there were all the controls and a couple of relatively defenceless pilots presuming that some wacko wasn't about to get bad ideas. I bet it's not an easy walk through to the cockpit now.



To: chaz who wrote (47043)9/24/2001 2:30:42 AM
From: Larry S.  Respond to of 54805
 
LUV- Southwest Air - has occasionally been mentioned on this thread. here is an update on their situation. LUV declined far less than any of the other airlines after WTC: -

September 24, 2001
Southwest Airlines' Formula for Success
To Be Tested in a More Cautious Market
By MELANIE TROTTMAN

DALLAS -- Southwest Airlines is trying to fly through the storm.

The nation's premier low-fare airline is the only carrier that didn't cut its capacity last week because of the huge drop-off in air travel, and the only big airline that hasn't said it will have to lay off employees. Indeed, fast-growing, consistently profitable Southwest has never had an employee layoff in its 30-year history.

Yet the fallout from the Sept. 11 hijackings and terrorist attacks could impact Southwest in a profound way. The airline, the nation's seventh-largest, relies heavily on a formula that squeezes the maximum profit out of its aircraft use: unloading and loading planes in just 20 minutes. Now, new airport security measures threaten to slow down this efficient process that has helped Southwest thrive.

Southwest also faces a threat to its core product: short-haul, point-to-point flights that move travelers quickly to their destinations. About 85% of the airline's flights are less than two hours, or 750 miles. If it takes longer to get through airport lines and security checks, more travelers, especially those skittish about flying, may opt to drive on short trips.

Unyielding, Southwest has continued to fly its full flight schedule of nearly 2,800 flights a day despite the fact that its planes were carrying perhaps only one-third the typical passenger load. The company said the numbers began to inch up in the middle of last week. Still, Southwest says it continues to incur millions of dollars a day in losses in the current conditions.

Last week, the nation's six largest airlines all moved to scale back flight schedules at least 20% and announced more than 70,000 job cuts collectively.


Southwest has halted aircraft deliveries from Boeing Co. and has spoken with the Chicago-based aerospace titan about deferring payment -- a move that indicates the airline is at least putting growth on hold. After a board meeting last Thursday, Chief Financial Officer Gary Kelly said Southwest concluded it, too, might have to make deep scheduling cuts similar to its rivals, probably in October, if loads don't improve. The revised schedule Southwest is considering doesn't demand or suggest layoffs among its 30,000 employees, Mr. Kelly said, because the carrier actually has staffing shortages among certain groups, such as pilots. Still, he couldn't rule out the possibility.

"We have short-term challenges," Mr. Kelly said. "I don't see that we have a long-term challenge here, where fundamentally our business has been changed."

Southwest believes it can handle the new security measures and still get its planes into and out of airports quickly. Since the start of this year, Southwest already had been working to improve its on-time-performance ranking, which dropped to fifth place last year after being first for most of the past decade. To help it improve, the airline added five minutes to turn times in certain cities, in some cases increasing them to 30 minutes. Recently, its performance had improved, and now the carrier believes it has some cushion in its schedule for new procedures.

Moreover, Southwest thinks its customers will continue to fly instead of drive, once confidence in air travel is restored. So far, the airline has seen no difference between passenger loads on short flights compared with long flights, although other airlines say flights under 750 miles are noticeably emptier than longer flights.

Analysts have taken Southwest at its word. UBS Warburg LLC analyst Sam Buttrick upgraded the stock Friday to buy from hold, saying it was attractive again after a 40% decline and citing the company's unequivocal statement that new security procedures aren't impacting aircraft turns. Morgan Stanley analyst Kevin Murphy noted Southwest's low unit costs, or operating expenses for each seat flown one mile, which he estimated at 7.5 cents, compared with the industry average of 9.5 cents. "They were the least impacted in 1991," when the Gulf War hurt bookings, Mr. Murphy said.

See full coverage of the attack's aftermath.

Rival airline executives are more skeptical. Southwest Chairman Herbert D. Kelleher "gets his planes in and out in 15 minutes. Not anymore, you don't," says Continental Airlines Chief Executive Gordon M. Bethune, citing increased security measures.

Southwest's Mr. Kelly wouldn't comment on specifics of the new security requirements on the ramp and the aircraft, but he vehemently maintains that they haven't affected turn times. During the past week, he said, the airline was "able to handle these new security procedures very, very smoothly."