SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The New Economy and its Winners -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: techanalyst1 who wrote (8774)9/24/2001 7:32:30 PM
From: Bill Harmond  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 57684
 
I think that's because Microsoft's capabilities and competitive edge in its core markets are way over any other software company's.



To: techanalyst1 who wrote (8774)9/25/2001 12:32:01 AM
From: Wizard  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 57684
 
>>Where has msft typically sold for on a p/s basis over the last 10 years when it was growing faster?

don't know... relative near-term fundamentals of MSFT are probably better than the rest of the software industry though. of course, that is not saying much. this quarter is another disaster for the industry. pre september 11th, I was thinking Q3 would be down -5% quarter in general and then a solid Q4 but Q3 is going to be much worse than that. it would be nice to call this quarter a throw-out due to being influenced by a non-recurring negative demand shock but this industry has a habit of attracting such once every few quarters for various reasons...

Northern California's economy isn't in a U or a V, its a 'canoe'. My old tech investment banker friends say Ebay is the only company in the area that is hiring.

Given the airline/travel/lodging/leisure industries recession and their ripple effects, it seems Mr Bin Laden and co. are going to cost our country about 500k+ jobs.

However, it is hard to really care about another leg down in the stock market when 7,000 innocent people were just slaughtered.



To: techanalyst1 who wrote (8774)4/18/2002 10:34:22 PM
From: techanalyst1  Respond to of 57684
 
I think I've been vindicated on the comparative valuation front on merq vs. msft:

The day I whined about the market's inability to see the valuation and growth rate of merq vs. msft, merq closed at 21 and msft at 52. Sebl was 13.80 and Symc was 18.75.

Maybe Merq isn't a "value" stock, but the growth rate and more reasonable valuation sure kept it from getting into hot water this earnings season.

TA