Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SirRealist who wrote (1693)	9/28/2001 3:22:32 PM
From: ratan lal	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

Imagine that the Taliban were, at one point, viewed as the best alternative, because the prior factionalism committed atrocities more repugnant. viewed by whom? If US, then the question is "should the US be meddling in other countries affairs?" Would the US even care to meddle if it did not have the financial and military power? Finally if we do meddle, should we not expect and accept reprisals? Q Q Q ? ? ?

To: SirRealist who wrote (1693)	9/28/2001 4:46:15 PM
From: Neeka	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 281500

Imagine that the Taliban were, at one point, viewed as the best alternative, because the prior factionalism committed atrocities more repugnant.>>>>>>> This is why I question what the Northern Alliance is, and what it believes. I haven't heard this discussed anywhere in the main street media. I posted some information yesterday that was meant to prompt such a discussion here. Message 16425383 Who will replace the Taliban? Will it be the same factions committed to more repugnant atrocities? Will this pattern be broken? M