SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Neeka who wrote (1720)9/28/2001 4:57:00 PM
From: SirRealist  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
I'd guess the Northern Alliance is being supported only to overthrow the Taliban and due to the risk of igniting further fundamentalist support, we will stay out of figuring out who leads from there.

Presumably, Iran will be supporting a Pushtun drive from the South and the NA from the North. Whatever remains of the Taliban and its supporters will struggle to control narrow enclaves along the Pakistan border.

Possibly, Afghanistan will be divided into two or three regions, not unlike Yugoslavia. Most subsequent humanitarian aid from us will go to those who help and seem most able to mount a successful government.

A more remote possibility would see a figurehead Prez (like the ex-King) with territorial governors holding the real power over the regions they lead.



To: Neeka who wrote (1720)9/28/2001 6:19:31 PM
From: ratan lal  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 281500
 
Who will replace the Taliban? Will it be the same factions committed to more repugnant atrocities?

Of course. They are our best bet against the Taliban right now.

Of course when they start attacking the US facilities, we will call back the Taliban to deal with them !

Welcome to our instant foreign policy !