Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : MARKET INDEX TECHNICAL ANALYSIS - MITA -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: J.T. who wrote (8715)	9/29/2001 9:33:50 AM
From: James F. Hopkins	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 19219

JT; Also I am able to put in the September symbols, and get the old trades , while I didn't check them all "yet" I just checked the 30 puts so far as that was were the big OCT contract happened on 9/06/01. That trade cost $180,000 and is now worth $2,500,000 I've traded these options before and they are not all that popular , I never have seen 2000 contracts of open interest in them Let alone 2000 in one day.. Most of that 2000 is still open so I sent a copy to the FBI. ( I hope they don't drag their feet or just dismiss it as nothing ) for all I know they may not understand the amount of money involved & I failed to point that out in my form at the time because I assumed they would, however on second thought the person who is screening the incoming tips may not know a dam thing about options and toss it in the trash. Again it was (Reuters) who just said no evidence was found about shady trades And because it was them I did the check. I've seen to much stuff in the past & over the years coming out of ( Reuters ) that was not only garbage but leads me to think they are crooked. And by the way to many calls from "Prudential" go wrong short term so I've come to think they are one of the most crooked money managers going. Not only that, they have in the past been brought up on charges of illegal insurance actions more than once. Jim