Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Football Forum (NFL) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Master (Hijacked) who wrote (7375)	10/2/2001 10:39:34 AM
From: Augustus Gloop	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 45639

Well, Like it or not they made the move I would have made. Over the past couple of years that team had seen a major decline in talent. They had to make a choice as to whether to play a guy who could keep them 8-8 and get mid round draft choices or play a guy who has a little more time that could be a system QB. He has good talent at wide-out but he takes too long to get rid of the ball. If they can speed him up and put a line in front of him there is a chance he could still develop. Flutie is a gamer who would never have been able to be worked into a 5 year plan. For the bills he would have served as nothing more than a security blanket to mediocrity. Thus lower draft choices resulting in weaker talent in the future.