Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: fyodor_ who wrote (56953)	10/2/2001 10:08:34 PM
From: Elmer	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 275872

If you argue it that way, you could as easily argue that it is misleading when Intel says their P4 runs 2GHz - insinuating it is twice as fast a 1GHz PIII (or even more), which it isn't. But the difference is that it does run at 2GHz. "Desperate times call for desperate measures"...That they do, but questioning the legality is completely bogus. I didn't bring up the subject or post the section of the California code but it does seem to fit. It seems pretty clear there is an intent to mislead if not outright defraud. And conspiracy to defraud is a crime as well... EP