SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: IngotWeTrust who wrote (77870)10/2/2001 9:55:46 PM
From: Andrew  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 116758
 
<hollowed Krugs filled with titanium would pass that weight test...check the proximity of their specific gravity if you have any doubts.>
I did - and you are wrong. Titanium is far too light - it has a specific gravity of 4.507 while gold is 19.300:

webelements.com
webelements.com

Perhaps you were thinking of a different heavy metal.



To: IngotWeTrust who wrote (77870)10/2/2001 10:32:13 PM
From: Alex  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 116758
 
<<Mr Smith is taking Dollars 340 as his initial target on a three-month view. He argues that the attacks on the US were the start of the drama not the climax; and that the reaction has yet to begin, both in the real world and in the gold market.

"Fear is out of the box. Risk dominates reward. Welcome (back) to the 1960s and 1970s," he said.>>

globalarchive.ft.com



To: IngotWeTrust who wrote (77870)10/3/2001 12:06:37 AM
From: long-gone  Respond to of 116758
 
<<So, yes, you saw a weighing device. However, hollowed Krugs filled with titanium would pass that weight test...check the proximity of their specific gravity if you have any doubts. >>

Difference could be picked up with accurate measuring instruments - IMHO maybe even an educated hand.(4.3X)
matl weight
cu in/lbs cu ft/lbs
ti 0.1621 280.1
au 0.6969 1204.3
source - Machinery's Hand Book #23