SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Solon who wrote (31094)10/7/2001 12:05:04 AM
From: gao seng  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 82486
 
A businessman, who may be a good person, but who commits a sin like lying about a material fact, etc., to complete a business deal, is a bad businessman. But, that does not mean he is a bad person.

Commerce is the glue that holds civlization together.

Religion should not be an impediment to commerce.

But, crimes against commerce are crimes against civilization.

And, of course, we all are guilty.

On a more metaphyisical level, let those who are without sin cast the first stone.

But, as a civilization, we must set in place methods of ensuring proper remedy for breaches of contractual obligations.

As for a proper response to your question, it depends upon the extent of their awareness of the fact that they are seeking evil goals.



To: Solon who wrote (31094)10/7/2001 1:32:25 AM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
that a good person can seek evil goals? And does that then suggest that "good" is an opinion rather than a fact?

Does everything suggest to you that good and evil are opinions rather then fact?

My point was a basicaly good person can mistaken on what is evil.

I would call someone an evil person if they habitually and knowingly commit evil.

Tim