Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Booms, Busts, and Recoveries -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ilaine who wrote (10610)	10/7/2001 4:30:13 PM
From: smolejv@gmx.net	Respond to of 74559

Oh my, CB. Im starting to get a killer of a headache... Guess we can expect a repeat hit of a Tomahawk, this time homing on some innocent group of Chinese tourists - expected TOA within next 24 hours. dj

To: Ilaine who wrote (10610)	10/7/2001 4:34:29 PM
From: carranza2	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 74559

Put your thinking cap on, CB, and ask yourself two questions. 1) You know that DEBKA is not reliable. Why give it any credence on matters which you suggest move the "global tectonic plates"? 2) Why would China, a nation that has its own problems with Islamic fundamentalists in the Western provinces (they include terror on the fundamentalists' part), side with them in a conflict that promises to harm the militants in a very substantial way? It would be the equivalent of the US having wittingly assisting the VietCong. DEBKA is not reliable, so don't get all frothy about its reports, especially if they don't make fundamental geopolitical sense.